TBI Case Study – John, Motorcycle Accident

Patient: John Doe, a 24-year-old male
Cause of Injury: Motorcycle accident
Injury Details: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), multiple fractures (including the right femur and left arm), lacerations, and contusions
Admission Date: July 1, 2024
Current Setting: Inpatient hospital rehabilitation unit

Initial Evaluation

Occupational Profile:

  • Personal Information: John is a recent college graduate who works as a software developer. He enjoys outdoor activities such as hiking and mountain biking. John lives alone but has a close-knit group of friends and family who are supportive.
  • Prior Level of Function: Independent in all activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Active social life and engaged in various physical activities.
  • Current Concerns: John expresses frustration with his current limitations and fears about his future independence and return to work and leisure activities.

Evaluation Components:

  • Cognitive Assessment: Using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
    • Results: John scored 18/30, indicating deficits in attention, memory, executive functioning, and visuospatial skills.
  • Physical Assessment: Using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
    • Results: Significant impairments in mobility, self-care, and transfers due to fractures and TBI.
  • Brief Independence Measure (BIMS):
    • Results: John scored 6/15, showing significant cognitive and functional limitations impacting his independence.
  • Psychosocial Assessment: Using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
    • Results: Moderate levels of depression and anxiety, likely due to the trauma and current functional limitations.
  • Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM):
    • Results: John identifies key areas of concern, including performing self-care activities independently, returning to work, and resuming leisure activities. He rates his performance and satisfaction in these areas, highlighting significant dissatisfaction with his current abilities.

Safety Awareness and Impulsivity:

  • Observations: John demonstrates poor safety awareness and impulsivity, particularly during mobility and ADL tasks, leading to increased risk of falls and injuries.

Summary of Evaluation: John presents with cognitive, physical, and sensory-perceptual deficits secondary to a traumatic brain injury and multiple fractures. These impairments significantly affect his ability to perform ADLs, IADLs, and engage in meaningful activities. The COPM results provide a patient-centered perspective on his performance and satisfaction in daily activities, guiding the intervention planning.

Intervention Planning

Goals:

  1. Short-Term Goals:
    • Improve attention and memory to participate in basic ADLs independently within 2 weeks.
    • Increase upper and lower extremity strength and range of motion to facilitate safe transfers and mobility within 3 weeks.
    • Enhance sensory tolerance to participate in therapy sessions for 30 minutes without distress within 2 weeks.
    • Improve safety awareness and reduce impulsivity during ADL tasks within 4 weeks.
  2. Long-Term Goals:
    • Achieve independence in all basic ADLs and IADLs within 3 months.
    • Return to work with accommodations within 6 months.
    • Resume participation in preferred leisure activities with modifications as needed within 6 months.

Intervention Plan:

  1. Cognitive Rehabilitation:
    • Use of cognitive remediation strategies, such as task-specific training and cognitive exercises.
    • Incorporate memory aids (e.g., planners, alarms) and strategies to improve attention and executive functioning.
    • Dual-task training to improve cognitive and motor integration, such as walking while counting backwards or performing simple arithmetic tasks.
  2. Physical Rehabilitation:
    • Therapeutic exercises to improve strength, range of motion, and endurance.
    • Mobility training, including bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation with assistive devices.
    • ADL training focusing on dressing, grooming, and bathing with adaptive techniques and equipment.
  3. Safety Awareness and Impulsivity Management:
    • Implement structured routines and environmental modifications to enhance safety, such as clear pathways, non-slip mats, and visual cues.
    • Provide education and training on safety strategies, including pacing techniques and the use of assistive devices.
    • Supervise and gradually decrease assistance as John demonstrates improved safety awareness and impulse control.
  4. Occupation-Based Interest Interventions:
    • Incorporate John’s interests, such as technology and outdoor activities, into therapeutic activities to enhance engagement and motivation.
    • Use simulated work tasks to prepare John for a return to his job as a software developer.
    • Plan leisure activities that align with John’s interests, such as adaptive mountain biking or hiking.

SOAP Notes

Week 1-2: Initial Treatment Session Subjective:

  • John: “I feel frustrated because I can’t do things on my own. I worry I won’t be able to get back to my job or the activities I love.”

Objective:

  • John demonstrated increased agitation and impulsivity during transfer training, requiring verbal and physical cues for safety.
  • Participated in cognitive exercises focusing on attention and memory, showing improvement with fewer cues over time.
  • Performed upper and lower extremity exercises to increase strength and range of motion.

Assessment:

  • John’s frustration and anxiety are impacting his participation in therapy. Continued focus on safety awareness and cognitive strategies is needed.
  • Improvement noted in cognitive exercises, suggesting potential for further cognitive rehabilitation.
  • Physical strength and range of motion improving, but continued support required for safe mobility.

Plan:

  • Continue with dual-task cognitive and physical exercises.
  • Implement additional safety strategies, such as visual cues and structured routines.
  • Introduce more occupation-based activities related to John’s interests to enhance engagement and motivation.

Week 3-4: Follow-Up Treatment Session Subjective:

  • John: “I’m starting to feel a bit more in control, but I’m still worried about falling and hurting myself.”

Objective:

  • John engaged in advanced ADL training, demonstrating improved safety awareness with reduced impulsivity.
  • Participated in community reintegration activities, such as simulated shopping, showing improved cognitive-motor integration.
  • Continued with therapeutic exercises, showing increased strength and endurance.

Assessment:

  • John’s safety awareness and impulsivity are improving, as evidenced by his ability to participate in more complex ADLs with fewer cues.
  • Cognitive-motor integration is progressing well with dual-task activities.
  • Physical improvements noted, but further work needed to enhance endurance and confidence in community settings.

Plan:

  • Continue to advance ADL training with a focus on safety and independence.
  • Increase complexity of community reintegration tasks.
  • Maintain focus on dual-task activities to enhance cognitive and motor integration.
  • Begin planning for a gradual return to work with job-specific cognitive and physical tasks.

Week 5-6: Advanced Treatment Session Subjective:

  • John: “I’m feeling more confident and capable. I’m ready to start thinking about going back to work.”

Objective:

  • John successfully performed higher-level IADL tasks, such as meal preparation and simulated banking, with minimal assistance.
  • Participated in simulated work tasks related to software development, demonstrating improved cognitive functioning.
  • Engaged in adaptive leisure activities, such as modified hiking, showing increased endurance and enjoyment.

Assessment:

  • John is showing significant progress in both ADLs and IADLs, with improved safety and reduced impulsivity.
  • Cognitive and physical improvements suggest readiness for a gradual return to work.
  • Participation in leisure activities indicates enhanced motivation and engagement.

Plan:

  • Finalize plans for discharge, including outpatient occupational therapy and home health services.
  • Refer to vocational rehabilitation for job retraining and accommodations.
  • Continue supporting John’s emotional well-being with psychological services.

Discharge Planning

Criteria for Discharge:

  • John demonstrates independence in basic ADLs.
  • Improved cognitive functioning allowing for safe decision-making and problem-solving.
  • Ability to perform IADLs with minimal assistance.
  • Physical abilities sufficient for safe community mobility and participation in leisure activities.

Discharge Recommendations:

  • Outpatient occupational therapy for continued cognitive and physical rehabilitation.
  • Home health services for assistance with more complex IADLs.
  • Referral to a vocational rehabilitation program for job retraining and accommodations.
  • Follow-up with a psychologist or counselor for ongoing emotional support.

Referrals:

  • Physical Therapy: For continued mobility and strength training.
  • Speech-Language Pathology: For more focused cognitive-communication therapy.
  • Vocational Rehabilitation: To support John’s return to work.
  • Psychological Services: For ongoing management of depression and anxiety.

Follow-Up and Outcomes

6-Month Follow-Up:

  • John has returned to work part-time with accommodations and is progressing towards full-time employment.
  • He has resumed some leisure activities with modifications and continues to work on increasing his endurance.
  • Ongoing outpatient therapy sessions focus on fine-tuning his skills and addressing any remaining deficits.